When Writing Strikes

Writers are compelled to write. We are constantly having ideas. We are constantly thinking about twist or problems in our storylines and we see inspiration just about everywhere. Generally speaking, the challenge is not creative flow. Writers are bursting through the seams with creativity. Things like organization, structure, and TIME are our biggest enemy.

I submitted my final draft of my new book (Book 1 of 3) to my editor just as summer break began. The second half of my novel was completed just as my final undergrad semester was beginning. By way of a rough critique, I have summarized that, critical thinking and strategic writing for school has a negative effect on my creative writing flow. One would think that I took that new learning and adapted it. One would think that I have spent the entire summer writing. Well fans… I did not.

BREAK TIME

My break from all things thought provoking has been well over do. I am a mother, wife, student, dedicated member of church, and full-time career woman. My mind is always spinning and at the end of the publishing process I was stressed and overstretched. Aside from journaling and brainstorming the cover specifications for my new book. I did not commit any new creative ideas to paper (or screen) all summer. This does not mean I didn’t have them, only that I took time to clear my focus and relax.
Upside: I feel rested and clear.
Downside: School starts in less than a week, and suddenly I have been hit with an overwhelming urge to do corrections, plan out new ideas, and inspiration for book 2 in my new series.

TIME TO WRITE

During the rewrite process of Dreams of the Heart, I struggled with the working and writing. Writing and books are my passion. As many of my followers know, I do not work in that industry. My time to do creative writing was limited and sometimes nonexistence. The emotional toll of “not writing” was at times so heavy that it would manifest itself through tears or intense journaling. Oddly enough I learned that if I had time to cry and journal about NOT WRITING, then I had time to rewrite and improve Dreams of the Heart. Eventually, I came to some solid resolves about the time needed to write and invest in my career as an author. I applied those lessons to my writing schedule while working on my second novel and finished in half the time. It is still a struggle, but I no longer fret over the common problem. We make time for what is important in life. Pushing my creativity, my stories into the world is one of the most important things to me. How long it takes it not nearly as important as the act of getting it done.

TIME TO WORK

As I start the Master’s in Library Science program at Kent State and I looking forward to all the new things that I will learn. I have been preparing myself for the 3 classes and the overload of papers that I undoubtedly will have to write. I understand that my time will be locked up with reading and writing research papers and that the time to work on my book series will be limited. I have somewhat purposeful put myself on “downtime” behavior in preparation for taking 3 classes in the fall. I have a strong feeling that my life for the next 3 months will be writing; one way or another.

However, as God allowed me to do with my debut novel Dreams of the Heart, I will push through it. God gave me this gift for a reason and I will use it. The work needed to be become a successful author is hard with or without school. I plan to rise to the challenge. My ideas are solid and despite only having a few days to outline them into a writing plan for next month, I will do it.

Writing Room Inspirations

So, working on my second novel post-school has really made me take notice of my writing spaces. I have an awesome desk purchased some years back. It is cherry wood with a leather map of the world imprinted on it. I love my desk and anybody that knows me well would even say I am a little particular about it. Okay, I will be honest, if you are not Tanela Hicks I prefer you not touch it. The general rule of thumb is only writing specific or book related things touch the surface. A long time ago I read somewhere that owning and designated a writing space was an important routine when building your craft. The article kinda of stuck with me and thus far the technique has work, but as I move into the next phase of my writing career I am dreaming of more.

Now technically I do not have the space for what I dream of, but that has not stopped me from sketching and imagining.

Ideally, I would love an open office space that functions as a mini library and creative space. Obviously, books move and inspire me and the more I read the more I want to write. This library/office is beautiful.

However, I also love scenery. Water views or rustic scenes draw my focus when I can’t not solve an existing plot line. While bustling cityscapes help me develop characters and background detail. These views below are perfect creative thinking spaces as well.

Style, decor, and furniture all make up a big piece of my multi faceted dream. I honestly believe I would need two spaces just to accommodate my two different writing personalities. When I am creating the bones of my story or a character. I sketch and scribble a lot while typing out what I want to say. I tend to listen to loud neo soul or jazz and I need complete concentration. Aside from music, or the movies Twilight, Shawshank Redemption, or Lake House playing on the television; there can be no other activity around me. Since I have a family and small home generally I have headphones on and drinking coffee or tea while eating dry cereal (trade secrets).

When I am editing, rewriting, reviewing, or fixing something in my work; my writing personalities is different. I can, while at a minimum, carry on another conversation with someone (other than talking to myself). HGTV or similarly formatted television can be on but not loud. I do not have to be at my writing desk (bed, couch, elsewhere) and best of all I CAN DRINK. A glass of wine always makes my mistakes more noticeable.

So, my dream writing space would be doubled. I would love to have an open-air space featuring some variation of all the styles mentioned.

But then I would love to have a private space with installation, views, and no distractions. I believe it would love something like this!

National Novel Writing Month

National Novel Writing Month

Learning Myself Through My Writing Goals

By Tanela Hicks

My history with National Novel Writing Month is a little give and take; love and hate. Just like getting use to a new car, or understanding a new computer system, it took a while, but we finally understand our role in each other’s life. NaNo (as it is affectionately called) is there to be a motivator and a tool to help drive my writing career and I am here to use it. Simple.

Just as an overview, NaNo to me is the celebration and awareness of the craft of writing. There is an entire culture that pushes you to meet your writing goals throughout the year. There are camps for young writers, weekly encouragement from published authors, and tons of advice. During the month of November specifically it is “Campaign Time”. To keep it simple, if you are participating in the organization sponsored activities, you can enter a contest to complete 50,000 words in 30 days. At the end of the month you can submit what you have written for critiques, publishing help, and more. This contest not only serves as incentive, but drives project productivity. It’s a wonderful opportunity and totally free…or not use.

My first year being a part of the NaNo community I was very excited. Being the over organized person I am, I made a word count spread sheet to compare against their suggested rate of process. Yes, there are formulas, and programming in this spreadsheet that automatically told me the messages like “Great Job” when I meet my daily goal or things like “Words Waiting” when I slacked off.

national-writing-month

When I started in November 2013 with the NaNo, I actually had already completed the bulk of what “Dreams of the Heart” would come to be putting me well past the 50,000 benchmark the website set. So my big goal was to write every day. As you can see I did not succeeded at that, but overall I was thoroughly invigorated with the creativity process. I ended the month with approximately 18,000 thousand words and completed my first rough draft. Then came 2014 and I hit a huge drought. “Dreams of the Heart” draft one was complete and I was deep into rewrites. There were many complications, but my biggest headache was deciding on the level of adult content. The main character and I “fell out” multiple times the first half of the year over elements of the story that needed to be PG edited. As a true woman of faith and a new deacon’s wife it was very hard to determine what was right and what was wrong. I ultimately learned through experience and prayer to let the story direct your path no matter what. Once I settle on that school of thought, me and “Jamice”; main character of “Dreams of the Heart” become best buds again and my massive rewrite moved forward.

Writing novels, short stories, articles, or anything creative is not an easy task and those that can or even try to do it are special people. Reflecting back on my beginnings with NANO and “Dreams of the Heart” makes me smile and thank God for this talent that he has given me. I have learned so many lessons. I have applied advice received from that community and others to my two projects still in progress. Surrounding myself in a community of like-minded writers; all pushing towards similar goals, truly helped propel me to complete my first novel. If you are looking for a guide or catalyst this year for your writing try it. I will not guarantee you will hit the mark of 50,000 words, but you will learn something about your writing and a lot about yourself.

For more information on National Novel Writing Month Click Here

Happy Writing!

What’s ON! The Fall TV Review 2016

What’s ON! The Fall TV Review 2016

fall-tv-2016 It’s that time again. Fall TV premiere season is one of the exciting times for most people. It is a spotlight smorgasbord of Television creativity. I enjoy seeing what Hollywood writers come up with and present to me the viewer. Loving a good story and even better a great cinematic performance, I watch almost all the new shows and provide a programming guide from those who are yet undecided about who to give their time to. My reviews and analysis are solely based on my opinion, and do not reflect anything but facts of the shows production and my thoughts on its success. If you do not agree, RELAX, it’s just TV!

Designated Survivor is a riveting, surprising and educational television experience. History teachers and government club leaders all over are cheering at the creativity use of law and government. The details on how this could actually happen are just interesting enough to catch the attention of a house wife, while still being detailed enough to pass the history fact checkers. I see multiple story lines emerging, including but not limited to assassination attempts and adultery. The most impressive element in this show is the casting. The casting director should get some special recognition here because she pulled together a very diverse cast. Kudos to Liz Dean. Malik Yoba brings the wise calm head that all thrillers need while Tanner Buchanan is perfect to portray the young tortured millennial who just wants to live his life. This is important because the major fail point on politico shows is a connection with that 17-26 age group. Natascha McElhone brings a hauntingly dejected character to the show that is not quite readable, but I believe with creative scripting, the writers can spin that at their will creating plot points or new catalyst for the show. And finally Maggie Q. Most would say that the final appraisal should go to Keifer Sutherland, but I disagree. Sutherland is already a deserving star. I expect nothing but great performances and his star power is obvious. Maggie Q is one of the most under rated pilot queens in the business. Her lack of readable emotion ironically captures the most emotion and intrigue in the first 2 episodes. I am looking forward to seeing how they use her character and how they keep her integrated in the story line. Overall I think this is a winner for ABC. The gap of a politico action drama was a need that ABC needed to feel and Keifer Sutherland answered the call.

Grade A-

MacGyver premiered in September 1985 with a semi-young rugged action hero Angus MacGyver. The show had fast pace and centered around MacGyver’s (Richard Dean) ability to get out of tight spots with a paper clip, bottle of jelly, and a Swiss army knife. It was awesome, intriguing and an overall thrill to watch. The show that premiered this fall on CBS with the same title, is not the reboot that Henry Winkler promised. The new ‘MacGyver’; Lucas Till is an obvious attempt to draw in the youth of today, but it alienates the fans of the original hit show and the viewers that are bound to be home during the Friday night airing. The casting is just barely above a totally miss and the scripting is too backwards funny and does not fit the procedural action style the show intends to convey. During the dialogue about the mission we are getting flirty jokes and half-baked emotional flashbacks. The one positive that I can pull is the 4th wall communication about some of the stunts MacGyver pulls off. While some moms can see that as being dangerous to describe how to break through a metal plated door, I found that to be a pleasant reprieve from the team monologues and quirky banter. If it sounds like I am being hard it is not a mistake. The reboot of ‘MacGyver’ series was by far my most anticipated series this fall. I was a huge fan of the original and while I have been thoroughly surprised by some other CBS shows the year, this is a big miss. My only wish now is that some of the top writers and producers like Scott Gemmill and Lee David Zlotoff get off the train before it blows. This is a bomb that not even Richard Dean can disarm.

Grade D

Pitch is a meaningful milestone in TV history, but not for the reasons people think. It is an overdue acknowledgement of the struggle woman face to be considered equal. While the show highlights this point over and over, it is not the success in the show. I had to refer to my notes to remind myself what I thought while watch the CBS premiere. Kylie Bunbury is unpolished and unfortunately not extremely impactful as Ginny Baker, but she is very believable as the girl who just wants to play baseball. I have seen a lot of positive inexperience from Bunbury. The creators and writers have driven home the point of how hard it is to be a woman working in a male dominated field. I fear focusing in on the same point episode after episode will lose some of the viewers. Pitch can be a hit, if the writers expand a bit on the plot and center in on Ginny Baker. Give her some depth and other purposes the show may become more interesting. The pilot lacked a lot of dialogue from her and I wanted to hear more. And while the end of the pilot definitely delivered on emotional pull, I feel like I missed a few doses of intensity in the first inning. Give her a relationship, given her a dirty past, give her a secret baby and then show how she works through all that and still pitches a no hitter. That would be a world class game to watch on a Thursday. The one big positive is that the competition for viewers is not too tough so Pitch is playing a game against their selves right now. Overall I have a very mixed opinion for this show, but I am persuaded to lien in on the swing and say Pitch has potential.

Grade Solid C

Lethal Weapon was not on most TV viewer’s must watch list. To be honest it was not even on my long list of shows to review. Despite the lack of big promotion, the show is being received well by most who have tuned in. I am not a big Wayans fan, so I was not thrilled to watch, but after the huge disappointment that was MacGyver over on CBS I went to Hulu looking for some action to believe in. The development of Martian Riggs in this fresh and funny series is probably the best highlight thus far. Roger Murtaugh, played by Damon Wayans, comes across as unintentionally funny in an old fussy grandfather way. And this is not a jab at the very apparent age gap between Murtaugh and Riggs as the writers in episode 2 focus in on this point several times. It is just to say, that when Wayans is trying to be serious and be a hero at the same time, it comes across as relatable to the pre AARP viewers and pretty funny. I loved the explosive opening of the pilot, which proved to me I would not be bored to death with premise setup and I like that there is balance between intense emotional scenes and fast pace crime solving. The procedural nature of the show and the almost perfect dynamics of Wayans and Clayne Crawford will give Lethal Weapon permanent and solid primetime success for FOX.

Grade B-

The Good Place is not so good. It is an unfortunate over commitment to an idea that we want to laugh at the afterlife. There is also a bit of idea overload. In the pilot at first you think the premise is Kristen Bell growing some moral compass to help her earn her spot in the Good Place, but half way through it changes. The focuses shift to Ted Danson’s character and his preoccupation with system flaws and his short comings. This shift happens to quickly and doesn’t give the viewer a chance to adjust or accept the entire concept of the show. Add in the bad joke timing and you have a comedy show failure to connect. Michael Schur is not a comedy dud himself. He has been a part of some comedy TV show greats like Parks and Recreation and the unmatched The Office; but The Good Place puts him and Kristen Bell in a bad seat. While admittedly not a Ted Danson fan, I recognize the star power and expected him to prop up the dialogue a lot better than he does in the pilot episode. The show feels like a bunch of joke set ups without the punch lines. Kristen Bell’s performance as a woman in need of some serious moral training is cute, but barely chuckle funny. The life mate Chidi (William Jackson Harper) is adorable, but also not funny. Everyone else in the pilot episode just seemed oddly place, as if to say ‘there are other people in this heaven and we do have other points of view to give you’. I will wait on that! If none of this opinion if shared, I truly understand, however there is one more final bad mark for the Good Place. It premiered on a Monday night, which may have given it hope and a life line to hold on to during contract renewals. But the shows regularly air night is Thursdays, going up against (but not limited to) Grey’s, Rosewood, and CBS Football. See you on the cancellation list Good Place….sorry Kristen.

Grade D-

Bull is not fresh, but it is a well-crafted brain teaser. Dr Jason Bull played by Michael Weatherly is not extraordinary, but he is compelling as a non-attorney saving others’ lives with a little legal manipulation. The premise of the show is different, but the format has tones of the Mentalist and Franklin & Bash. The weekly plot is in dire need of overarching conflict and a solid enemy. The supporting character’s identity is muddled and lost making them unfortunately unremarkable. This is mostly because they do not seem have defined roles within the Bull team. The show does not resonate with the average male viewer, there is no eye candy for the typical housewife, and the young victims in Dr. Jason Bull’s care are an obvious draw to the millennials viewers. Overall I think it could be successful on a USA or A&E, but NBC may not be so eager to renew BULL once next if it decides to put all their push behind some of their projected top runners like Training Day and Pure Genius. Overall the setup is basic, the writing lacks depth, and the performances are getting lost somewhere in the middle.

Grade C-

Timeless is the pop culture hit in a long list of over saturation of a single theme. It cannot go unnoticed that there are several TV shows premiering this fall/winter season with time travel as a center focus. Forgetting for a moment that time travel depictions are extremely hard to pull off, the network Timeless is being anchor by (NBC) is slowly moving to more comedy programming so Timeless will have a long haul if they want to be TV success history. The show’s creator Eric Kriple who gave us the long running TV show gem Supernatural definitely has proven he can deliver interesting stories and develop characters into staples. I think Timeless will be a slow and steady gainer, especially in the younger demographic. The only pit holes I have identified in the first two episodes is the main character Lucy played by Abigail Spencer. The show depends a lot on her ability to sound wise and knowledgeable on all things in American history. Her character thus far has been painted in a very young, innocent, and light-hearted; and that does not translate directly to smart and wise. It may be hard for the 50+ viewer to find her character as a reliable source on history. Malcom Burnett as Rufus is perfect for the role Kripere created. He naturally looks skeptical of everything and his brain power out plays his physical presence. These are all things that I love to see in my IT professional. He is smart and funny and I love him on the show. Overall Timeless is a win for me and it will be on my must see list every week.

Grade A–

Atlanta is an amazingly funny raw look at the life in a day of the young and struggling African American. It is comical, dark, and not appropriate for family television session, but for adults who laugh in spite of their life circumstances it is the perfect therapeutic hour. This show is the African American version of Seinfeld. It doesn’t really have the solid good guy bad guy/dynamic and the humor seems almost by accident, but somehow it works. I have watched 2 full episodes out of sequence and been thoroughly entertained each time. Vanessa played by Zazle Beetz is successful in life enough to make you believe that we (African Americans) are not all failure, but she is still plagued with the everyday grid of “having it all’; so most viewers in this demographic can related. I think the winning component of this show is the raw truths they display about life. Yes, while the scenarios played out on Atlanta are not experience by ALL BLACKS or even half, it is an experience of many who are just above the line in everything in life. Donald Glover does in outstanding job of portraying the yet to be successful father and he gets double acclaim with this show as creator. He is doing something that the movie 8 Mile already did, but bringing it from a weekly urban viewpoint. I am looking forward to its run and think it will be the dark underdog champion of cable TV this year.

Grade B

Frequency is the CW new hit show. It is another one in line with the new trend of taking a movie that is just out of relevance range and turning it into a TV show. We saw it with Minority Report and Limitless and now CW is on the radio line. The show’s opener was not much different than the movie. For those of you who have not seen the 2000 Sci-fi thriller no worries, the pilot has given you what you need to move forward. The gender reverse (another TV trend) is going to be the pin that makes this show sink or swim. Ramiy Sullivan, played by newcomer Peyton List brings good passion to the screen, but it is Riley Smith performance as young/old dad that truly impresses me. He is gritty and apologetic and very much reminds me of Dennis Quaid in the original film. While personally I am a huge fan of the movie and its premise, I feel like it can only entertain the Comic Con audience. There is not enough of the law or crime investigation element to draw in the CSI or Law and Order fans, and just barely enough science fiction to intrigue viewers like me. The shows other big miss is the scheduling, it works perfectly for CW’s calendar, but has major competition amongst the other networks.

Grade C+

Although I did not write complete reviews I did also watch several series that returned for new seasons. Scandal, Code Black and Blackish all earned their return time slots. Veteran show Criminal Minds struggled with viewership. Not because the show’s substance, but because of poor casting and production choices. A special call out to Rosewood; I am not a fan of the show at all, but I am happy Morris Chestnut is out there making his mark on television. Disclosure, I watched 2 episodes of every show with the expectation of The Good Place (I just couldn’t’) and I took most my notes and thoughts down live to ensure that my opinion developed honestly and organically during the TV experience. I am looking forward to some Mid Season Premieres to fill my entertainment gap. Hopefully ABC Family’s Shadow Hunters can scratch my monster itch and help mend the womb’s Sleepy Hollow left behind. And I am equally hopefully that the new Kevin Williamson’s creation Time After Time will remove my yearning to jump back in time to save ABCs Forever.